ABERDEEN
PROVING GROUND, Md. – The development of an innovative physics-based model to support
research and testing of decontamination technologies is the first-of-its-kind
to come to fruition at the U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center
(ECBC).
CREATIVE
(Contact hazard Residual hazard Efficacy Agent T&E Integrated Variable
Environment) is a predictive decontamination system performance model (SPM)
being developed to supplement and support existing decontamination evaluations
in the laboratory, as well as during developmental and operational testing. The
model is envisioned to be used to predict post-decontamination hazards before
developmental and operational testing, or full scale testing of military
equipment, takes place.
“We
have successfully completed researching of a first generation model of CREATIVE
which addresses contamination, decontamination and post-decontamination hazards
of materials at the laboratory testing level,” said Brent Mantooth, Ph.D., a
research scientist with ECBC’s decontamination sciences branch. “Right now,
this innovative prediction model is focused on predicting what will happen at
laboratory scale testing so that we can work towards predicting what would
occur at full-scale testing.”
“With
the model, we will eventually be able to take data and test results from
laboratory testing and calculate post-decontamination hazards before the start
of any full scale testing,” said Mantooth. “These calculations will produce all
the information needed to determine if an equipment item undergoing full scale
testing will be decontaminated to a level that is protective of the health and
safety of the unprotected individual.”
According
to Mantooth, the model will have clear advantages over the way decontamination
technologies are researched and evaluated today. The model will shorten the
development timeline for decontamination technology by helping to understand
the performance of decontaminants. In addition, the model will help support
full-scale testing during developmental and operational testing, and get a
decontamination technology into the hands of the warfighter more quickly. As a
result, testing conditions that are seen as too expensive or otherwise
prohibitive can be reliably simulated.
Current
decontamination technologies are tested in the lab using small samples of
materials called panels that represent materials found on military
equipment. Examples of these materials
include glass, tire rubber, plastics and various paints such as Chemical Agent
Resistant Coatings. These evaluations require a substantial amount of analysis
including three types of tests in which multiple agents are tested on eight
types of materials along with appropriate control groups. Technology
evaluations could require up to 2,400 samples, and up to 7,200 if the
recommendation to conduct the evaluation at three different temperatures is
included.
“It
is not practical to conduct testing at this scale.” Mantooth said. “This is
where a physics-based model excels.
“There
is an expressed need to develop a predictive model to support, supplement, and
enhance our decontamination research and testing efforts. And we needed to
bridge the gap with a predictive model that could be used between individual
material testing in the laboratory and developmental and operational testing.”
The
gap was bridged with the completion of multiple projects, including Development
of the 2007 Chemical Decontaminant Source Document, the Small-Item Vapor Test
Methods, the Vapor Composite System Calculation, and the Development of Complex
Panel Methods.
The
studies illustrated that in order to make a predictive model, mass transport
first had to be considered. Mass transport is the movement of agent and a
decontaminant into, within and out of a contaminated item. It is a complex,
interacting system with many simultaneous dynamic processes, which include the
agent, the material contaminated, how long the item was contaminated, migration
of the agent into and out an item after absorption, the decontaminant used and
elements of the surrounding environment, such as, air flow and temperature.
“By
considering mass transport we can now recognize that decontamination is a
complex, interactive system with many ongoing processes,” Mantooth said.
Mantooth explained a physics-based model
enables researchers to understand the reasons for seeing the results observed
in the laboratory. By simulating the physics and chemistry that occurs, there
is a better understanding of what decontaminants are doing well and where
improvement can be made.
To
develop CREATIVE, the decontamination services branch modeling team used a
mathematical technique called inverse analysis. This technique provided them
the means in which to determine the physics-based parameters that could not be
directly measured.
“The development of these techniques was vital
to the development of the system performance model,” said Mantooth. “Now that
we have the model parameters, we can simulate many of the what-if questions
that were not practical to test at the full scale level, as well as identify
which tests to conduct at that level.”
The
model enables the simulation of many conditions with results that would
indicate what vapor and contact hazards there may be to unprotected personnel
in a variety of items. The results of these simulations will also indicate the
need to consider many new aspects of when and how decontaminants are used and
how they are to mitigate hazards.
Because
of the complexity of conducting evaluations on decontamination technologies,
Mantooth’s modeling team is currently working on a second generation model.
This model will address evaluating multiple materials at the same time, along
with other chemical agents and more complicated systems with the goal of being
able to support and supplement evaluations at the full scale level in the
future.
“The
development of the CREATIVE model cannot be understated,” Mantooth said. “We will now be able to conduct future
research, development and testing of decontamination technologies more quickly
and at a reduced cost while getting it into the hands of the warfighter
faster.”
For
more information about ECBC, visit http://www.ecbc.army.mil/.
ECBC
is the Army’s principal research and development center for chemical and
biological defense technology, engineering and field operations. ECBC has
achieved major technological advances for the warfighter and for our national
defense, with a long and distinguished history of providing the Armed Forces
with quality systems and outstanding customer service. ECBC is a U.S. Army
Research, Development and Engineering Command laboratory located at the
Edgewood Area of Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. For more information about
the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, please visit our website at
http://www.ecbc.army.mil or call (410) 436-7118.
No comments:
Post a Comment