By Amaani Lyle
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, May 19, 2014 – The Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency will display more than 100 projects and 29 programs in the
Pentagon’s courtyard May 21 to demonstrate cybersecurity technologies and spark
feedback from warfighters, a DARPA scientist said during a May 16 interview
with the Pentagon Channel here.
Daniel Kaufman, DARPA’s Information Innovation Office
director, said the ever-changing landscape of network warfare spurs the need
for ongoing analysis of and dialogue about network security and greater user
empowerment for warfighters in even the most remote locales.
“I want them to see the tools we’re building them to fight
better and more effectively,” Kaufman said. “We’re technicians, scientists, and
engineers and we build things, but there’s nothing like having somebody in
uniform who actually has to use your product give you actual feedback.”
Kaufman described network warfare as a “new war,” with some
98 percent of devices having embedded microprocessors of some type.
“Everything in the world today has a computer -- your phone,
your television, all our weapons systems,” Kaufman said. “We see huge promise
in it and get benefits from network technology, but how are we going to protect
these systems?”
But making forces safer yet more lethal to the enemy
requires asking tough and unusual questions, Kaufman explained.
“It’s this cross-over between criminal organizations,
terrorist organizations, state actors and non-state actors,” he added, “and the
question is what tools do we have to create a new map?”
Kaufman said he and his team wondered about the possibility
of creating software that was smart enough to contend with the best hackers in
the world. He recounted an example of an all-computer chess league scientists
developed in the 1970s.
“After seven years,” he said, “we beat a grand master, a
year after that we beat [Russian Grand master Garry] Kasparov and from then on
humans play for second place.”
Beyond the scope of chess, Kaufman noted, a more “human
endeavor” such as the popular game show Jeopardy! even had famed contestant Ken
Jennings toppled by IBM supercomputer Watson in 2011.
As such, DARPA will emulate Defcon, an annual hacker
tournament in Las Vegas, to pit computers against computers and fine-tune
network security.
But changing the game on network protection, Kaufman said,
requires recognizing that hackers always have the advantage -- in that one
breach can attack millions of machines.
“For the most part, either you have a PC or a Mac; we run
almost all the same applications so one attack can hit many of us,” he said.
“But what if you can make every computer different, much like our immune
system, and now the attacker needs a special attack for every computer?”
And while Kaufman acknowledges some information technology
officials are leery of the idea, DARPA scientists think they can accomplish
this at a low level where attackers enter a system.
He explained that a computer is the only thing people buy
that is “fundamentally broken,” since it always requires updates and patches,
which can create network fissures that hackers may exploit.
As a result, DARPA scientists have been developing a
computer that is designed with security in mind, and by its very construction
prevents hackers. But the balancing act between thwarting hackers and enabling
users persists.
“If we’re going to empower the military we need to change
that dynamic; we have to make it so that you don’t need a Ph.D. in computer
science … that you can still use it and program it for your own uses,” Kaufman
said.
In big data, Kaufman noted that while the internet typically
only indexes about 1 to 5 percent of all searchable information, national
security reasons may call for a deeper probe into the web.
“The first thing we’re going after is the scourge of human
trafficking,” he said, “and we’re already showing early results and making a
dent in [countering it].”
Kaufman also said DARPA is trying to simplify computer
language by taking complex programs such as Java, C+, and Haskell, which
require extraneous compiling steps, and instead enabling delivery of actual
commands.
“What if you could program a computer by actually telling it
what you want to do?” Kaufman posited. “In one sense we should get rid of half
the errors because now I don’t have to translate it into some weird language.
I’m just talking to it.”
Another simultaneous challenge and promise of big data,
Kaufman asserts, is assessing and simplifying the complexities of information
gathering.
Big Mechanism software, he said, is a program that could
read and digest all articles on a searchable topic and bring that information
back to the user.
“Imagine that we could create a piece of software that would
go out and read all the articles, break it down into all of its constituent
parts, build it back into a model and then hand it back to us … and now that
goes to a scientist and fundamentally, if we do it right, it’s a brand-new way
of doing science.”
No comments:
Post a Comment