You buy the battery pack of 150 thinking
you’ll never need another battery ever again!
Then three months later you’re cursing the universe because your XBOX
360 remote needs two batteries and the only one you’ve managed to find is a
suspicious-looking, partially gnawed AA you found under the couch.
And let us not even get into the arduous
process of actually having to dispose of them.
And sure, you could make the argument
that rechargeable batteries are the more responsible way to go, but I find that
I have trust issues when it comes to those things. The more they get used, the less useful they
seem to be.
Ah, but fear not, battery-users! Scientists from the Army Research Laboratory
(ARL) are working to improve the life and power of batteries. How are they doing that? It all comes down to the science of energy.
ARL researchers have developed a
substance that increases the life of a battery by 30% without increasing the
weight. The new technology deals with the
electrolyte part of lithium-ion batteries.
By modifying the liquid electrolytes, the battery is able to tolerate
higher voltages.
So why are they doing this? Well, the Army wants to increase the cell
voltage of lithium ion batteries, but still maintain their reliability. Get the best of both worlds, so to
speak. Sounds too good to be true?
Surprisingly, it isn’t.
“The idea is with higher voltage
batteries we can increase the energy density, which means that the soldiers can
carry less weight into the field, but still have the same amount of energy
carrying with them,” said Dr. Arthur Von Cresce, materials scientist with the
U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Cresce is
a part of the team that helped develop the substance that helped improve the
electrolyte performance in batteries.
And that’s no small feat.
“Electrolytes are a very vulnerable
component to the battery,” Dr. Cresce explains.
“We are modifying the electrolytes so we can tolerate higher
voltages. Through that, we accomplish
the goal of higher energy density.”
This is a holistic approach to restructuring
the way a battery works that goes beyond the military. Battery use is an everyday part of our
lives. There’s a movement in the
military to “go green”– and lithium batteries would be “definitely the way to
go” with that, according to Dr. Cresce.
However, lithium batteries do have
certain problems. They don’t work well
at low temperatures, and they’re heavy.
If you buy a hybrid car, that thing has a 600 pound battery pack. Changing the weight of batteries, and
eventually how they work, could make a world of difference (pun intended, of
course).
Making this a reality across the global
board is more than just tweaking a little piece here or improving an
electrolyte there, it’s a team effort.
And by that I mean when it comes to batteries, all the components work
in unison. That means they have to be
engineered together.
“We work as a team. I’m working with Kang Xu [a scientist at the
Army Research Laboratory] on the liquid electrolytes. But we work together with other departments
and specialists. We all advance, but we
only advance together,” said Dr. Cresce.
The environmental impact of these
batteries remains the same as it would for its lesser efficient counterparts,
but having a more efficient and lighter battery on the battlefield could
actually improve the life and health of service members.
“It’s my understanding that soldiers
have to carry between 16-30 pounds of batteries, and that’s because they have a
lot of different battery operated devices, like a GPS, communicator, laser
sight, night vision, etc. If we
increase the energy density, we can reduce the amount of weight that they
carry,” Cresce says.
Researchers estimate that they could
reduce the payload carry of a service member by about ten pounds, and if
anyone’s carted around 80-90 lbs of weight in blistering heat and scorching
desert, ten pounds off could make a big difference.
“It’s a big deal to take some weight off
their backs,” Cresce adds. “We’re trying
to shrink the overall bulk size of batteries [as well], while maintaining
safety and reliability. Reliability is
the big one for us. These guys are using
these in abusive conditions.”
Right now, they’re limited in the shapes
of sizes of cells, but Cresce is hopeful for the future. “In the future I see really small or
conformal, even flexible batteries.”
As amazing as this all is, I still find
myself skeptical when the words “rechargeable” are coupled with the word
“battery”.
I thought you said you would be there
for me! *sob*
Dr. Cresce is no stranger to my
hesitancy. “We all suffer from
this. As our laptops and cell phones
age, the batteries hold less charge. So
typically the soldiers don’t trust these batteries. What we’re finding is with our modifications,
the batteries can have more cycles at a higher voltage. They retain their charge. If they’re left
alone, if they’re charged many times, they’re still reliable.”
“ARL does a lot of fundamental research,
so a lot of these issues of finding fuel wherever you can or using these very
simple systems comes down to what kind of fundamentals and materials you
understand, and we’re very good at that here,” he says.
Some of this sustainable energy
technology is already being implemented in the field with the warfighter. There are blanket solar cells and portable
solar cells currently being used on posts and bases in Afghanistan, and the ARL
is looking into developing fuel cell electric generation technology that could
revolutionize the way the military harnesses energy in the future.
When it comes down to it, this goes way
beyond having a more convenient battery for video games controllers or
equipment in the field. This kind of
science could shape the future of energy-efficiency.
“I think it’s kind of interesting that
we [the Army] have the chance to affect the world and the science of
batteries. We’re really at the cutting
edge of lithium ion and fuel cell and solar research,” Dr. Cresce said with an
upbeat lift in his tone. “This is a
really cool place to be.”
———- Information for this blog post
provided by the Army Research Laboratory
No comments:
Post a Comment