Long-term
study finds that each species plays a role in maintaining a productive
ecosystem
Vegetation, such as a patch of prairie
or a forest stand, is more productive in the long run when more plant species
are present, results of a new study show.
The long-term study of plant
biodiversity found that each species plays a role in maintaining a productive
ecosystem, especially when a long time horizon is considered.
The research found that every additional
species in a plot contributed to a gradual increase in both soil fertility and
biomass production over a 14-year period.
This week's issue of the journal Science
publishes the results. They highlight the importance of managing for diversity
in prairies, forests and crops, according to Peter Reich, lead author of the
paper and a forest ecologist at the University of Minnesota.
Reich and colleagues looked at how the
effect of diversity on productivity of plants changed over the long-term.
Two large field experiments were
conducted at the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Cedar Creek Long-Term
Ecological Research (LTER) site in Minnesota, one of 26 such NSF LTER sites
around the globe in ecosystems from forests to grasslands, tundra to coral
reefs.
"This study reveals what short-term
experiments have missed: that the effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystems are
more complex, severe and unpredictable than previously thought," says Matt
Kane, an NSF LTER program director.
"The work shows the importance of
doing long-term research," says Kane, "in this case documenting for
the first time the critical importance of biodiversity for ecosystem health and
sustainability."
The biodiversity experiments at Cedar
Creek are the longest-running such experiments in the world, says Reich.
They contain plots with one, four, nine
or 16 different species of plants.
The research used long-lived prairie
plants, but serves as a model system for all vegetation, whether prairie,
forest or row crop.
The study also showed how diversity
works by demonstrating that different species have different ways of acquiring
water, nutrients and carbon--and maintaining them in an ecosystem.
"Prior shorter-term studies, most
about two years long, found that diversity increased productivity, but that
having more than six or eight species in a plot gave no additional
benefit," Reich says.
The scientists found that over a 14-year
time span, all 16 species in the most diverse plots contributed more and more
each year to higher soil fertility and biomass production.
"The take-home message," says
Reich, "is that when we reduce diversity in the landscape--think of a
cornfield or a pine plantation or a suburban lawn--we are failing to capitalize
on the valuable natural services that biodiversity provides."
Co-authors of the paper are David
Tilman, Forest Isbell, Kevin Mueller, Sarah Hobbie and Nico Eisenhauer of the
University of Minnesota, and Dan Flynn of the University of Zurich.
-NSF-
No comments:
Post a Comment