Showing posts with label anthrax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anthrax. Show all posts

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Work Vows DoD’s Live Anthrax Incident ‘Will Never Happen Again’



By Terri Moon Cronk
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2015 – Calling the Defense Department’s inadvertent May delivery of live anthrax to a commercial lab “a massive institutional failure,” Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work today outlined findings of the review and steps DoD will take to ensure it never happens again.

But given the failure, Work said at a Pentagon news conference, he, Defense Secretary Ash Carter and DoD senior leadership “take absolutely no comfort in this.”

The live-anthrax shipment to a commercial lab was narrowed down to one of four DoD labs, he said, and added that of the total batches in the lab’s inventory, more than half tested positive for live anthrax -- 17 of 33.

DoD ships inactivated samples of anthrax spores to outside labs for research and development of DoD countermeasures to protect U.S. troops, allies, partners and the American public from biological attack, the deputy defense secretary said.

“[In] the past, some nations have produced biological weapons, and we cannot be certain that rogue nations or terrorist groups won’t do the same in the future,” he said of DoD’s work with anthrax.

Four Labs Handle Anthrax

The four labs that handle anthrax are the Army’s labs at Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, and in Maryland, the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and the Naval Medical Research Center.

When the incident unfolded, the Centers for Disease Control began onsite investigations, and Work directed Frank Kendall, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, to conduct the 30-day review of the labs’ procedures, processes and protocols associated with inactivating anthrax spores.

The deputy secretary said he wanted to determine whether the accidental delivery was a one-time failure or a “more systemic problem” in DoD’s biohazard safety procedures, and he assembled a team of experts from the departments of Agriculture, Defense, Energy and Homeland Security, the FBI, academia and industry.

Review Committee

The review committee found the four labs had irradiated -- destroyed the bacterium with radiation -- 149 batches of live anthrax spores and reported them inactivated and safe for testing since 2003. All were accounted for and tested or destroyed, he said.

Other findings:

-- Fifty-three of the 149 batches are no longer in the DoD inventory or available for testing, and recipients were told to destroy remaining batches.

-- Of the 96 batches to test in DoD inventory at Dugway Proving Ground, 17 of 33 tested positive for re-growth/live anthrax.

“Obviously, when over half of anthrax batches presumed to be inactivated instead prove to contain live anthrax spores, we have a major problem, and the numbers confirm this judgment,” Work said.

“We know over the past 12 years, 86 laboratories in 20 states, the District of Columbia, and seven foreign countries ultimately received what were supposedly inactivated spores that originated at Dugway,” he added.

The deputy defense secretary said he expects the numbers to increase with secondary shipments, which CDC is responsible for tracking.

No Infections Resulted

Work said the live anthrax was delivered in small amounts of liquid in “extremely low concentrations,” and all were handled in labs. Not a single infection resulted in lab workers in 12 years, he added.

Three main causes led to the incident, Work said:

-- No national standards exist for anthrax inactivation procedures;

-- Several factors at Dugway led to a higher likelihood of misidentifying the live spores; and

-- Biohazard protocol is not standardized across DoD, because the labs report to multiple chains of command and two services.

“The American public expects much more from us, and we should expect much more from ourselves,” Work said. “Secretary Carter has made plain he expects these issues be dealt with swiftly and comprehensively to ensure that a failure of this sort never happens again.”

Work said he directed Kendall’s office to:

-- Work with DoD stakeholders, the CDC, and other relevant departments and agencies to develop standardized irradiation and viability testing protocols for all DOD labs that work with spore-producing organisms like anthrax;

-- Ensure sufficient funding is available through the Chemical and Biological Defense Program for research into the development of standardized irradiation and viability testing protocols;

-- Review and revise as necessary DoD biosafety and biosecurity policy and ensure consistent application across DoD laboratories; and

--Oversee military department and service implementation of the review committee’s recommendations.

Work said he also directed the secretaries of the Army and Navy to investigate and develop plans that cover quality assurance, peer review, and program management and to provide quarterly updates on progress. The Army secretary was designated as DoD’s executive agent for the Biological Select Agent and Toxin Biosafety Program, the deputy defense secretary added. The moratorium on production, handling, testing, and shipment will continue until the report’s recommendations are addressed, he said.

Notification Led to Immediate Action

Work commended the lab that notified the CDC of the live anthrax delivery.

“Because of their notification, the department was able to take immediate action, stop all shipping of inactivated anthrax, assess our procedures, processes, and protocols; and begin to institute needed changes,” he said. “In doing so, they helped ensure nobody was infected by anthrax.

“This review taught us lessons we needed to learn, and identified institutional and procedural failures we need urgently to address,” he continued. “We are shocked by these failures. … DoD takes full responsibility for these failures, and we are implementing changes and recommending the establishment of procedures, processes and protocols that will prevent such a biohazard safety failure does not happen again.”

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

FBI and Justice Department Response to NAS Review of Scientific Approaches Used During the Investigation of the 2001 Anthrax Letters

The following is in response to the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report “Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the FBI’s Investigation of the 2001 Anthrax Letters” (hereinafter "report").

“The FBI appreciates the efforts, time and expertise of this group of highly respected professionals of the academy. The academy was asked by the FBI to conduct an independent review in appreciation of the significance of the anthrax investigation and the groundbreaking nature of the science involved and its role in resolving the case. We commend the committee formed by the academy for a report that provides valuable guidance and better prepares the FBI to respond to attacks of a similar nature in the future.

“Among other findings, the committee confirmed the value of the emerging field of ‘microbial forensics,’ which proved significant in solving this case. This scientific technique established a critical lead as to the origins of the anthrax used in the attacks, allowing investigators to focus investigative resources and efforts. Ultimately, the late Dr. Bruce Ivins was determined to be the perpetrator of the deadly mailings. The FBI and Department of Justice were preparing for prosecution at the time of Dr. Ivins’ death.

“As the report recognizes, this was an investigation of almost unprecedented scope, complexity, and duration. Its origins were in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks when the FBI was unsure of possible links to those attacks and concerned about follow-on attacks. The investigation necessarily moved at a rapid pace, proceeding on two parallel fronts: a traditional investigation, involving tracking leads and conducting interviews, and a scientific one, led by the FBI Lab and included scientists from outside of law enforcement. From the outset, the scientific and traditional investigations were mutually reinforcing. Each helped guide and direct the other. The report notes the complexity of the parallel tracks of the investigation and how aspects of each track informed decisions to proceed with or abandon particular lines of the investigation.

“As the report notes, one of the most significant scientific approaches undertaken in the case—the field of microbial forensics—was being developed as the investigation unfolded. While the biological and chemical analytical methods applied in the investigation were neither new nor unique, the application was both innovative and groundbreaking. The committee’s findings highlight the emerging role that microbial forensics played in this investigation and its promise for future investigations. The report also recognized the FBI’s unprecedented efforts to form outside partnerships within the scientific community and the value that their expertise can lend to a criminal investigation of this magnitude.

“The committee’s report reiterates what is and is not possible to establish through science alone in a criminal investigation of this magnitude. The committee’s focus was on the more novel scientific approaches used in this investigation and did not review the traditional forensic methods and techniques employed or the significant body of evidence gathered through traditional law enforcement techniques. The committee also concluded that it is not possible to reach a definitive conclusion about the origins of the B. anthracis in the mailings based on the available scientific evidence alone. The FBI has long maintained that while science played a significant role, it was the totality of the investigative process that determined the outcome of the anthrax case. Although there have been great strides in forensic science over the years, rarely does science alone solve an investigation. The scientific findings in this case provided investigators with valuable investigative leads that led to the identification of the late Dr. Bruce Ivins as the perpetrator of the anthrax attacks.

“Over the course of the investigation, the FBI and the Postal Inspection Service devoted 600,000 investigator work hours to the case and assigned 17 special agents to a task force, along with 10 U.S. Postal Inspectors. The investigation spanned six continents; involved over 10,000 witness interviews, 80 searches, 26,000 e-mail reviews, and analyses of 4 million megabytes of computer memory; and resulted in the issuance of 5,750 grand jury subpoenas. Additionally, 29 government, university, and commercial laboratories assisted in conducting the scientific analyses that were an important aspect of the investigation.

“The FBI believes that today’s report will increase the public’s understanding of the exhaustive effort that resolved one of the most extensive investigations in the history of the FBI.

“The FBI and Justice Department investigative summary of evidence developed in the ‘Amerithrax’ investigation and numerous attachments are accessible to the public and were posted last year to the Justice Department website at www.justice.gov/amerithrax under the Freedom of Information Act. In addition, roughly 2,700 pages of FBI documents related to the Amerithrax case are accessible to the public and were posted last year to the FBI website at http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/amerithrax.htm under the Freedom of Information Act.”