Showing posts with label defense acquisition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label defense acquisition. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Army Develops Ultra-Light Vehicle for Changing Battlefields

A green vehicle without doors and with large knobby tires, carrying people wearing camouflage uniforms, kicks up dirt as it ascends up an incline off-road during daytime.

Getting troops and equipment across the battlefield is a vital part of every theater operation — soldiers and their kits, as well as spare ammunition and other supplies, all need to arrive quickly, with nothing left behind — or risk jeopardizing the mission. 

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and Humvee have done a great job at performing those tasks so far, but the battlefield is always changing. In some cases, those vehicles are too heavy and impractical for the task at hand. So, the Army chose to develop a new, ultra-light troop transport vehicle.

The Infantry Squad Vehicle is an ultra-light tactical vehicle that carries nine passengers and their equipment. Its evolution was informed by soldier touchpoint events.

"We are extremely proud of this program and what we've been able to achieve in a short period of time," said Susan Fung, Portfolio Acquisition Executive Maneuver Ground's mobile brigade combat team deputy project manager. "In this high-stakes environment of modern warfare, playing it completely safe is often the most dangerous thing a leader can do for decades."

Fung explained that the team is intentionally trading the illusion of a risk-free acquisition process for the ability to use commercial products and iterating with continuous soldier feedback through the Army's Transformation in Contact program.

"Traditional defense acquisition has prioritized its bureaucratic processes and zero-defect mentality over speed, and while well-intentioned, that approach often meant our soldiers had to wait quite a bit for critical capabilities to reach the field," she said.  

Exponential Growth

The Infantry Squad Vehicle program began in 2019, with a procurement objective of 649 vehicles. However, based on soldier feedback and TIC experimentation, Fung said soldiers told them what they truly needed. 

"This led to an explosive growth driven entirely by operational demand," she added.

The number of vehicles required increased to 900 in February 2021. It increased two more times and was set at 2,593. In April 2025, the service approved the ISV utility variant and increased the Army procurement objective, bringing the total to 5,733 vehicles across both variants, Fung explained.

"In February of 2026, the Army established the current position objective and procurement objective at 11,582 vehicles," she said. "That shows you the increased objective based on soldier demand, and that's really equivalent to about an 18-fold increase from the original requirement. Not because of requirements creep, but really because soldiers validated the capability in the combat training environments and demanded more."

John Hufstedler, the product director for ground mobility vehicles at PAE Maneuver Ground, said that connecting with the system's mission was critical during the development of the vehicle. 

"Early on, the ISV succeeded by staying locked-in. A few key requirements were transportability, [but] mobility and payload and resisting requirements creep," he said, adding Army senior leaders kept the vehicle's mission in focus. 

"Anytime somebody wanted to add a radio with encrypted keys or hang another piece of encrypted equipment off the platform, leadership just didn't buy into it. And that allowed the vehicle to stay focused and true to its mission, so we didn't have to leave a soldier back with the vehicle. All nine could go execute the mission and objective," Hufstedler said.

The traditional acquisition approach allows custom military specifications, extensive government testing and sequential milestone gates. Hufstedler explained that this process can take four to 10 years, often resulting in cost overruns and technological obsolescence.

Instead, he explained that the ISV took the rapid acquisition approach, using commercial off-the-shelf solutions and minimal military modifications. That approach resulted in the first unit being equipped within 24 months. 

Transparency Aids Progress

Taking a more risk-positive approach to developing the ISV required somewhat of a culture change within PAE Maneuver Ground. Specifically, it required more direct, transparent communication.

Hufstedler believes that leading by example, empathy, listening, incorporating team feedback into decisions and a willingness to stand by those decisions as leaders were key. He added that providing team autonomy, while clearly defining boundaries and success criteria and transparency at all levels of communication, also contributed to their success.

Next-Generation Variants

"With the ISV program, we prove[d] that calculated risk works," Hufstedler said. "We keep going back to commerciality — I think that has helped us a lot — trusting our soldiers' judgment and moving at the speed of relevance; I think we've delivered that capability."

The Army's willingness to accept commercial standards as a starting point and make the soldiers the primary evaluators of the equipment will be critical to the success of developing ISV variants, he noted.

Fung said the team is currently developing the ISV heavy variant. It will include enhanced onboard power generation and storage capability to support next-generation command and control equipment.

"Overall, the ISV program is a great example of our acquisition reform, which allows getting capabilities to the field faster, leveraging commercial technologies while staying agile and giving soldiers what they really want," she said.

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Pentagon's Special Ops Office to Host Rapid Tech Innovation Event

The fourth and final line of effort in the 2026 National Defense Strategy calls for the supercharging of the defense industrial base; and within that effort is a call to grow nontraditional vendors. 

To that end, the War Department's Office of the Assistant Secretary of War for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict will host a one-day "accelerator" event, July 24, in the national capital region, in which representatives from more than a dozen companies will have the opportunity to pitch innovative solutions across nine areas related to the military's special operations community. 

The event comes as the office is seeking ways to rapidly innovate technologies and get them into the hands of warfighters quicker than the traditional acquisition avenues. 

"Traditionally, in acquisition, there's a lot of work and energy around the government figuring out what it needs and then telling industry to just build what it thinks it needs; and this is flipping the script on that," explained Bonnie Evangelista, the office's acquisition director for the Secretariat for Special Operations.   

Rather, she said, the office is working to identify what the mission needs and then identify what industry-driven solutions already exist on the market that can meet that. 

"That is a complete 180 from [a traditional] acquisition perspective," Evangelista said, noting that the state of battlefield technology is rapidly changing in a matter of hours and days rather than years and decades as in the past. 

The method the office incorporates into fielding these new technologies is likened to a "critical triangle," wherein warfighters are put in direct contact with private-sector innovators, as well as acquisition industry experts who understand the fiscal and contractual aspect of getting the new technology into the field.   

"We are doing this accelerator event specifically to highlight the might of that triangle coming together to leverage, and kind of put pen to paper on what [Secretary of War Pete Hegseth] is talking about [regarding] empowering the warfighter [and] creating faster spirals to get technology into the field — and doing that in a very, very short time frame," said Carmella Teeter, deputy assistant secretary of war for special operations analysis, resources and capabilities.   

Whereas many traditional acquisition processes can take three or more years to get from awarding of a contract to putting the new technology into the field, the goal for getting any innovative approach or capability that the office selects for acquisition into the field is six months or less, with contracts being awarded the day of the event.  

To get participants for the accelerator event, the team called for short proposal submissions, asking each applicant for a two-page white paper proposal on how they would address certain challenges. 

Soon, the office received nearly 700 applications, which were eventually narrowed down to 15 organizations being invited to the July 24 event. 

During the day of the event, participants will give an initial presentation consisting of an oral presentation, technical brief and government question-and-answer session. 

Any project selected during the first phase — or gate — will be awarded an initial $10,000, with the eligibility to be invited to the second gate of the event and potentially be awarded an additional $50,000 if the technology meets government mission requirements. 

Those companies that pass the second gate will then proceed to the third gate, which is prototype delivery, followed by the final gate of production.  

"[The accelerator] is very focused on trying to break down those barriers to entry that we see in particular with small businesses and the startups," Teeter said, adding that the goal is to cut bureaucracy and create synergy by way of the aforementioned critical triangle.  

Teeter said that what ultimately drives projects like the upcoming accelerator event is the necessity to remember that the warfighters deserve to have the best technology at their disposal, and as quickly as possible. 

"We owe that to these people that are going to be asked to solve the impossible problems," she said. "We owe them unfair advantage on the battlefield, and that's what this is all designed to do: to give our warfighters unfair advantage by making sure that we remember from all the way up to the senior levels here in the [War Department] that their voice and their comfort level with that technology is the thing that we care about most; and we want to empower them to have a say in their future with that."   

If the upcoming event ultimately proves successful, Teeter said she could envision similar events also permeating throughout the department.