Showing posts with label body armor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label body armor. Show all posts

Friday, August 31, 2012

Protecting Soldiers In Extreme Environments



At the U.S. Army Research Laboratory scientists and engineers have been studying how they can make higher performance materials for soldiers at lighter weights.

Army researchers want to enhance soldiers’ battlefield effectiveness without placing an extra load on their backs.

The challenge has led to the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, or ARL, Enterprise for Multiscale Research of Materials, made up of in-house research and most recently, two cooperative agreements awarded in April.

Researchers will develop materials to protect soldiers in extreme dynamic environments; and create energy efficient devices and batteries.

Johns Hopkins University will lead the materials in extreme environments collaboration. The research lab has invested up to $90 million over 10 years for a five-year initial study that could be renewed for an additional five years. Among the major partner institutions are the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), the University of Delaware and Rutgers University.

University of Utah will head ARL’s multiscale modeling research. The research lab has awarded up to $20.9 million toward the lighter-weight materials program.

A number of institutions will work towards multiscale modeling: Boston University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Harvard University, Brown University, the University of California (Davis), and the Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy.

The goal is to bring together experts from government, academia and industry to overcome daunting obstacles to develop new materials.

“It’s a big deal,” said John Beatty, the Materials in Extreme Dynamic Environments collaborative alliance manager, who is part of the Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, ARL. “We will make significant advances in designing materials, but our focus with this enterprise is as much about changing the way people think about designing as it is anything else.”

Right now ARL researchers have some understanding of the mechanical properties of materials and some understanding of the electronic properties, but over time we want to blend the knowledge, said John Pellegrino, acting director of ARL, who was formerly the director of the Computational and Information Sciences Directorate, overseeing the Enterprise for Multiscale Materials Research.

“It is very ambitious to say we will be able to come up with a set of models that can fully describe materials’ behavior,” Pellegrino said. “But we are hopeful we will be able to model materials well enough that we can begin to design materials using the models, and predict how they will behave. This would give us insight into a whole new class of material capabilities.”

In conjunction with ARL, the consortium will lead to a more comprehensive study of materials in the future even though each one is technically independent of the other, Pellegrino said.

The extreme dynamic environments study will be based from the Hopkins Extreme Materials Institute, or HEMI, at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, which has been years in the making.

The institute will focus on the behavior of materials and systems under extreme conditions, said K.T. Ramesh, the Alonzo G. Decker, Jr. Professor of Science & Engineering at Johns Hopkins University, founding director of HEMI and a professor of mechanical engineering.

“We are interested in impact and such extreme events from a very broad perspective –including high pressure and high-strain rates,” Ramesh explained.

The science is fundamentally close enough to address a range of related problems, like homeland security, asteroid impact and nuclear threats.

“What affects the material is the huge amount of energy landing all at once,” Ramesh said. “You can’t develop a new protective material until you can understand what happens to it in extreme environments.”

Ramesh wants the joint university-ARL team to both understand fundamental mechanisms and be able to articulate the findings to anyone coming on board.

“That is one of the measures of success,” he said.

Each of the partner institutions involved in the extreme dynamic environments research brings a unique perspective that combines for a multidisciplinary approach to solving the problem.

For instance, Caltech will use a range of tools they have developed over 20 years to accurately model the behavior of materials from the subatomic level all the way to the scale of bulk materials.

“Right now we don’t have a predictive model for designing advanced materials,” said Kaushik Bhattacharya, Caltech’s lead and the Howell N. Tyson Sr., Professor of Mechanics and professor of materials science. “We have some theories that guide us, but they really are not fully predictive.”

Scientists have to understand the complete hierarchy of the advanced materials and how all of the pieces fit together, then how the levels of hierarchy change during a high-velocity impact, Bhattacharya said.

“We hope to increase the speed of development as well as the strength of materials through such rigorous analysis,” he said.

The undertaking may seem huge considering the time frame for incorporating new classes of materials into applications now can take as much as 20 years from initial research to first use.

There are many risks associated with finding a material that serves the function you need. One major challenge is even if you succeed, it often doesn’t diminish the cost of similar research going forward, said Pellegrino.

“Another challenge is that the complexity of materials has grown,” explained Pellegrino. “Edisonian-approach research has given us spectacular results in the past. We have gotten better armor than before, different electron devices, including batteries, than we have ever had. All of that is great, but what we need now is far more complex than we have ever needed.”

Soldiers are carrying up to 32 pounds of batteries to power their technological devices in the field these days.

This is one of the concerns that the University of Utah-led consortium will address.

“We want to help the Army make advances in fundamental research that will lead to better materials to help our soldiers in the field,” says computing Professor Martin Berzins, principal investigator from the University of Utah.

Besides batteries, partners, such as Boston University, along with others, will look closely at developing new approaches for designing smaller and more efficient electromagnetic devices that meet military needs.

The design simulation research is based on a five-year plan that could be extended for an additional five years if it is successful.

“What we are looking for is a materials-by-design capability that is done by validated modeling from the smallest to the largest relevant scale,” said Meredith Reed, collaborative alliance manager for the consortium, and member of the Sensors & Electron Devices Directorate at ARL. “We want better control and prediction of transport phenomena in order to get the desired properties to develop new Army technologies.”

The focus of the program is well-aligned with the White House Materials Genomes Initiative, or MGI, that has been underway for about a year to drastically increase advanced materials design, Reed said.

A White House blog posted May 14 mentioned that achieving the MGI vision demands an “all hands on deck” approach, with dedicated involvement from academic institutions, industry, professional societies, as well as government.

“The MGI white paper talks about creating an ecosystem where manufacturing and development come together and are more streamlined so that discoveries might not have to take 20 years to make it to market,” Pellegrino said. “Having that ecosystem increases the chance of collaboration not only in military-specific problems, but the scientific understanding of advanced materials design will grow that much faster across the board.”

For more information about the Enterprise for Multiscale Research of Materials, visit the White House website.

By Joyce P. Brayboy, U.S. Army Research Laboratory
 From www.army.mil

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

High Tech Night Vision And Helmet Sensors


The Gen II Helmet Sensor finally brings a screening capability to potential head and brain injuries.

When a soldier goes through a concussive event, such as an IED explosion, he or she often does not remember exactly what happened. The event is so sudden, and the jolt so intense, that there are cases where the soldier has walked away, thinking he was unharmed, only to learn later that he has suffered a traumatic brain injury.

The new Gen II Helmet Sensor takes away the guesswork by recording the forces that affected the soldier during the concussive event.

The helmet-mounted sensor records, measures and stores linear and rotational accelerations to the helmet. It even measures the overpressure generated by an explosive event. This information will help with regard to early detection of traumatic brain injury, and will help experts compile information that could lead to better detection and improved diagnosis of concussive events.

Though the unit is not a medical device, the data it collects will be very useful to the medical community in providing treatment of traumatic brain injuries.

The Gen II sensor has a USB port for charging its battery (good for one year) and for transferring its data to a laptop computer. It weighs approximately 2.14 ounces and can store up to 1 gigabyte of data.

Story provided by peosoldier.armylive.dodlive.mil

But that’s not all!

The AN/AVS-6 Aviator’s Night Vision Imaging System (ANVIS) is a third-generation, helmet-mounted, direct-view, image-intensification device that enables aviators to operate more effectively and safely during low-light and degraded battlefield conditions.

Learn more about ANVIS
The low-light sensitivity represents a 35 to 40 percent improvement over the earliest ANVIS. Additionally, the gated power supply enables operation at significantly higher light levels than any of the previous designs. All ANVIS systems are capable of operating for 24 hours on a pair of AA batteries.

Friday, July 20, 2012

Designing Safety Helmets -- Science of the Summer Olympics


Designing Safety Helmets


For many athletes at the 2012 Summer Olympics, safety helmets will be an essential part of their athletic gear. Nikhil Gupta, a mechanical engineer at New York University's Polytechnic Institute, explains how safety helmets are designed, constructed and tested.

Credit: NBC Learn and National Science Foundation

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Equipment Makes The Difference


U.S. Army soldiers give first-hand accounts of how the evolution of equipment, specifically body armor, has worked to save their lives and the lives of their soldiers.  To learn more about the advances of Army equipment, visit Program Executive Office (PEO) soldier’s website .


From DMA Army

Friday, March 2, 2012

‘Kevlar Underpants’ Protect Pelvic Region

WASHINGTON (Feb. 22, 2012) — For dismounted soldiers patrolling Afghanistan roads, improvised explosive devices can be even more devastating than for those in armored vehicles, but a new line of protection may help.

“A few years ago, in certain areas of Afghanistan, we started to notice the dismounted improvised explosive device (known as IED) threat becoming more prevalent,” said Lt. Col. Frank J. Lozano, PEO Soldier protective equipment. “There were a lot of significant injuries, and very traumatic injuries occurring to soldiers in the lower extremity area. A lot of soldiers losing their lower leg below the knee. A lot of above-the-knee amputations, and a lot of high hip amputations.”

Soldiers who stepped on an IED might suffer injuries that required amputations which didn’t leave enough of a limb for a prosthetic leg, for instance. But those Soldiers were also suffering extensive damage to the perineum region, the part of the body that includes the anus and reproductive organs.

“It’s very traumatic, very heartbreaking, when soldiers go through those types of events, and they are very young, and then they come home and they are not able to have children,” said Lozano. “It’s one of the harsh realities of this type of warfare when you have dismounted IEDs.”

The Army wanted to do something to offer protection to soldiers. Taking a cue from British forces that had already found a material solution to the problem, the Army developed the Pelvic Protection System. The system includes two layers of protection for Soldiers, including the Tier I protective under-garment, called the “PUG,” and the Tier II protective outer-garment, called the “POG.”

“We wanted first to be able to protect the genital region so that soldiers going through those traumatic events would still be able to do things like have a family when they get home,” Lozano said.

Both components of the system are worn like shorts. The PUG is worn under a soldier’s ACU pants. It can be worn in place of underwear, or over the top of a Soldier’s underwear. Some soldiers have called them “Kevlar boxers” or “combat underpants” and it’s not far from the truth.

“It’s kind of like a bicycle shorts garment,” Lozano said. “It’s designed to be worn under the pants, close to the skin. You can wear it like you’d wear a normal piece of underwear.”

The PUG has a breathable, moisture-wicking material on the outer thighs. Along the inner thighs is knitted Kevlar to protect the fleshy inner parts of the thighs and the femoral artery. Over the groin, more knitted or woven Kevlar. “It’s not really very complicated,” Lozano said.

The colonel said that as a result of an IED blast, sand, dirt, and “manure that’s been in the ground for decades” is pulverized and can wind up embedded in a Soldier’s flesh.

“It can take 20 or 25 surgeries to go through and pick all that out,” he said. “If you don’t get it all, then that causes infections and it can lead to further amputations,” Lozano said.

The PUG is part of a system to prevent that from happening in the first place. The fabric used in the garment has also been tested to ensure that it won’t melt or drip when exposed to high heat.

“Since it’s so close to the skin, we don’t want to exacerbate any type of heat damage a Soldier might get in an IED blast,” Lozano explained.

The outer garment, the POG, provides even more protection for soldiers, and performs similar to the soft portions of the improved outer tactical vest. It “protects along a greater range of fragments,” Lozano said.

While soldiers can wear the undergarment on its own, Lozano said if Soldiers are going to wear the outer garment they should wear it in conjunction with the undergarment.

“Because the Tier II has more ballistic protection, it is a little more rigid,” he said. “If you wear the Tier I under the Tier II, it prevents chafing. It also provides the maximum amount of coverage together with the maximum amount of protection, without restricting your movement.”

Wear test and user evaluations have ensured that the tiered pelvic protection system is comfortable for soldiers to wear,” said Lozano said. “You might go through testing and think you’ve got a great design, but then you put it on a Soldier and tell him to road march for 20 miles and shoot and go through an obstacle course and find out, it’s a terrible design.”

He said that even if the protection is great, if it’s not comfortable, soldiers might not want to wear it.

Soldiers in theater who have worn the gear have reported back on their experience and have helped inform changes to the pelvic protection system, Lozano said. Early on, he said, there were reports of chafing and “poor thermal management,” for instance.

“We’ve worked with the Soldiers in theater to redesign the system; we’ve gone through a couple of design iterations,” Lozano said. “It’s taken a good six to nine months. We’re getting now to an optimized system where soldiers are seeing their feedback codified in a material solution and it’s more comfortable and breathable and Soldiers are more willing and apt to wear it.”

The Army first put the pelvic protection system into theater in June 2011. Now, the system has been fielded to some 15,000 soldiers. The typical issue includes three PUGs and one POG. Fielding is happening now for soldiers in theater and for Soldiers stateside.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Army Announces Greatest Inventions

By David McNally, U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM)

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, Md., Sept. 12, 2011 — Army officials announced the winners of its greatest inventions competition Aug. 23. Earlier this summer a panel of combat veteran Soldiers reviewed and voted for the most innovative advances in Army technology.

“The contributions made by these teams promise to improve the well being of Soldiers and the Army’s capability to contribute to quality of life and our national security,” said Maj. Gen. Nick Justice, U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command commanding general. “I would like to expressly thank you for submitting your Army Greatest Inventions nomination packages which continue to make the Army Greatest Inventions program a success.”

The winners, in alphabetical order:

40mm Infrared Illuminant Cartridge, M992: Soldiers now have capabilities to engage the enemy far more effectively during nighttime operations. The Army’s new infrared illuminating cartridges/projectiles produce infrared light that is invisible to the naked eye, but is clearly visible through night vision devices that U.S. Soldiers use in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

5.56mm M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round: Since June, the Program Executive Office for Ammunition at Picatinny Arsenal has fielded about 30 million new 5.56mm M855A1 Enhanced Performance Rounds in Afghanistan. The bullet has been redesigned and now features a larger steel penetrator on its tip. A notable feature of the EPR is that its bullet features a copper core. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

Green Eyes – Escalation of Force Kit Integration with the CROWS System: The system emits a wide band of green light that temporarily disrupts a person’s vision so that driving a vehicle or aiming a weapon becomes difficult if not impossible. One application would be to warn civilians away from checkpoints and other areas where their safety is at risk. At closer distances, the lasers provide an immediate, non-lethal capability to deter aggressive actions. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

Husky Mark III, 2G 2-Seat Prototype: This landmine detection vehicle is blast survivable, overpass capable and field reparable. Officials said the second generation 2-seat prototype is a natural evolution of the larger MK III Husky. The Husky Mark III/2G 2-Seat Prototype responds to the immediate warfighter need to mitigate the risks of task overload on the Husky operator, increases the Route Clearance Package’s ability to find and neutralize improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, and provides direct fire capability for the lead vehicle of the RCP.

The kit allows for the platform to be transported with air assets in a roll-on-roll-off configuration, increasing the readiness level and, at the same time, decreasing the logistical footprint and costs of maintaining the equipment in the theater of operations. (Source: Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center)

Jackal Explosive Hazard Pre-Detonation System: The Jackal is an IED defeat system designed to remove the threat of IEDs against Soldiers, tactical vehicle platforms and overall mission success. In 2010, the Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center developed and fielded Jackal to Soldiers throughout Iraq to help counter roadside bombs. In particular, Jackal neutralizes the lethal IED threats putting Soldiers at risk during route clearance and convoy related missions.

Jackal functions to keep Soldiers outside the IEDs area of lethality and increase the survivability of vehicle platforms. Unlike its predecessors, the Jackal is designed to be modular and adaptable to new and emerging IED devices. Therefore, the Jackal provides significant capability to the Soldier and their mission and, more importantly, saves lives. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

M240L 7.62mm Lightweight Medium Machine Gun: The new machine gun reduces the weight of the existing M240B without compromising reliability. “The titanium M240L represents a leap in weapons technology inspired by Soldier feedback. The lessons learned from this program will undoubtedly benefit future weapons systems that will maintain our continued advantage on the battlefield,” said Col. Douglas Tamilio, Project Manager Soldier Weapons for PEO Soldier. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

mCare Project: mCare, short for mobile care, is a cell phone based bi-directional messaging system developed by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command’s Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center. mCare was developed by modifying commercial off-the-shelf technologies to meet the unique needs of the Army Medical Department. Secure, HIPAA-compliant messaging system was needed to operate on wounded warriors’ existing mobile devices, in a manner uniquely distinct from text messaging or email.

This allows members of the care team to connect with Warriors-in-Transition throughout their outpatient recovery process through a device they already own and are familiar using — their personal cell phone. (Source: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command)

Mortar Fire Control System – Dismounted: The MFCS-D reduces time to fire first round from eight minutes during the day and 12 minutes at night to less than two minutes for both day and night. The kit consists of ruggedized computers, battery power supplies, displays, navigation and pointing hardware, and associated mounting hardware.

The system enhances the responsiveness of the M120A1 120mm Towed Mortar System, enabling digital coordination of multiple systems and fire support network and significantly reducing time required to emplace, fire and displace the weapon. (Source: Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center)

RG-31 Robot Deployment System: The need for a low-cost and lightweight solution in transporting and deploying route clearance robots in combat brought on the development of the TARDEC RG-31. The system enables Soldiers to comfortably transport, deploy and operate road clearance robots from the protected area inside the vehicle.

The RDS kit allows for route clearance units to use the full range of robotics capabilities without having to physically unload and deploy the equipment out the back of the vehicle by hand, exposing them to enemy threats. The system will have a positive impact on how Soldiers transport, deploy, and engage roadside threats in combat for years to come, officials said. (Source: Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center)

Soldier Wearable Integrated Power Equipment System: The Soldier Wearable Integrated Power Equipment System, or SWIPES, utilizes the MOLLE vest and integrates force protection electronics and communications equipment with an advanced battery power source. The use of BA-8180/U and BA-8140/U Zinc-air batteries for direct power of equipment allows for extended mission times without the burden of power source swaps or power source charging due to their high energy density.

This combination can extend operating times of communication systems and surveillance equipment for search and rescue operations. The SWIPES allows for individual tailoring by the Warfighter and is designed to accept new applications as they become available. (Source: Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center)

2010 Soldier Greatest Inventions Award Winners

Ironman Pack’ Ammunition Pack System for Small Dismounted Teams: Staff Sgt. Vincent Winkowski and fellow members of the 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry Regiment of the Iowa National Guard originally rigged their own prototype design for this high-capacity ammunition carriage system enables a machine gunner to carry and fire up to 500 rounds of linked ammunition from a rucksack-like carrier.

Culvert Denial Process: Cpl. Eric DeHart, 428th Engineer Company, designed and built a culvert-denial system to stop the placement of roadside bombs in culverts. The device looks like a screen across the opening and allows water and debris to pass through but doesn’t leave enough space for improvised explosive devices.

The Army’s Greatest Inventions awards are truly Soldiers’ Choice Awards, Justice wrote in an announcement to the Army’s research, development and engineering workforce.

“All of the nominated inventions demonstrate significant contributions to the warfighter,” he said.

A panel of noncommissioned officers with recent combat experience as well as hands-on, practical experience, in addition to a panel of TRADOC field grade officers judged the nominations.

Awards will be presented by Gen. Ann E. Dunwoody, Army Materiel Command commanding general, during the Association of the U.S. Army Annual Meeting Oct. 10-12 in Washington, D.C.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Army Announces Improvements to Body-Armor Testing

If you like stories like these, check out these military technology books written by actual veterans who got to use it.

By Julie Weckerlein

Citing the utmost confidence in the combat performance of Soldier-worn body armor, U.S. Army leaders reiterated to reporters recently that protecting troops is the highest priority and therefore the service has already implemented a host of recommendations to improve body-armor testing procedures.

“We provide our Soldiers the best body armor that exists in the world today. It is the most tested body armor in the world as well,” said Lt. Gen. Bill Phillips, military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army – Acquisition, Logistics and Technology.

“I am not aware of any incident downrange where the body armor failed to protect against a round that it was designed to defend against,” Phillips said.

The improvements to body-armor testing procedures were in line with recommendations cited in an Aug. 1 Department of Defense Inspector General report, Army officials said.

In particular, the Army has implemented a uniform set of standards, protocols and procedures for body-armor testing, improved methods of measuring and tracking key test parameters, created data bases to compile test information, conducted altitude and weather tests and performed a series of risk assessments on body-armor plates — all actions called for in The DoD Inspector General report, which examined the Army’s testing of ballistic inserts for seven contracts awarded between 2004 and 2006.

Implementation of all of the recommendations cited in the DoD Inspector General report will be complete by October of this year, Phillips said.

“As soon as we find that we can do something better, I want to assure you that the Army’s going to take quick and decisive action and to make sure that we are focusing on Soldier protection. That is our most important task. We have high confidence in all the protective systems that we give our Soldiers,” Phillips said.

Although improvements to the testing process go back to efforts which began prior to 2008, the Army adopted a new DoD-wide set of standards for body-armor testing in May 2010, Phillips said. The new protocol establishes standards, referencing, rules, procedures and analytical processes for hard-body armor testing.

Establishing methods to measure the velocity of test rounds was one of many improvements the Army has made to its body-armor testing procedures.

“We test these plates against the toughest, hardest round in theater and we shoot it at our test ranges at velocities higher than could be fired out of a normal rifle,” said Col. William Cole, project manager, Soldier Protection and Individual Equipment.

Having recently returned from visiting deployed troops in Afghanistan wherein Soldiers conducted a six-day offensive operation against insurgents in the mountains, Phillips said Army troops believe in their body armor with high confidence that it will protect them.

“Our Soldiers have the highest confidence in our body armor. There’s nothing that’s more important to Army acquisition and to our Army than Soldier protection and Soldier safety. It is so important that we make sure to give our Soldiers the best equipment we can.”

Explaining that the Army’s body armor has repeatedly saved lives in combat, Phillips cited a quote from Staff Sgt. Fred Row of the 101st Airborne Division who survived being hit by three enemy rounds to the chest in Iraq in February of 2009. Rowe’s testimony before the House Armed Services Committee in 2009 documented how body armor saved his life.

“I took three rounds to the chest — with body armor. All three rounds were stopped by the plates. It hurt, but I was still mission-capable. I was still able to do my job,” Rowe said.

(Originally posted on army.mil)

Monday, June 6, 2011

H.P. White Laboratory Expands Management Team

Business Development Executive John Cronin Brings a Depth of Body Armor Manufacturing and International Commercialization Expertise to Armor Testing Laboratory

Baltimore, MD – H.P. White Laboratory, Inc. announces the addition of John Cronin to its management team; Cronin is now responsible for global Business Development for the world’s largest independent test laboratory of personal and vehicular armor. Cronin will lead efforts for developing and launching new business lines, strategic marketing initiatives, and client satisfaction programs. With more than 10 years experience in armor development and manufacturing, he provides valuable conformity assessment support for meeting product-to-market objectives, and insights to global armor standards.

"We're undergoing revitalizing change at H.P. White. Over the past few months, we've significantly reduced queue times and increased throughput, allowing us to help our customers move from quote to test to report faster than anyone in the industry,” said Mike Parker, President, H.P. White. "With more than a decade’s experience in the development, production and commercialization of armor products, John understands our clients’ needs as only a client can.”

In addition to developing and marketing protective products with enhanced design margins, John has helped improve officer life-safety through his work on various standards committees and armor training workshops. As a contributor on the American Society for Testing and Materials' (ASTM) working group WK24613, John helped bring to market the first ASTM test standard to measure hypodermic needle resistance of protective gloves worn by law enforcement, corrections, private security, and military personnel.

As former chairman of the Protective Textiles Session at Techtextil NA, John worked to disseminate knowledge about the latest armor materials technology advancements. On an ongoing basis, John will serve on the Techtextil NA Advisory Council to attract key industry technologists to the Council’s annual symposium. These activities position John at the forefront of technology advances, and as a valuable informational resource for H.P. White's clients.

Founded in 1936, H.P. White is in its 75th year of operation and world renowned as the leading ballistic and ballistic resistance laboratory. The laboratory is located at 3114 Scarboro Road, in Street, Maryland. For more information, email info@hpwhite.com, visit http://www.hpwhite.com, or call 1-410-838-6550.

Contacts
John Cronin, Business Development Manager
Telephone: +1.410.838.6550
john.cronin@hpwhite.com

About H.P. White Laboratory, Inc
As an industry pioneer and current world leader, for 75 years H.P. White has specialized in research and development, validation testing, certification and quality control evaluations of firearms, body armor, and vehicular armor systems. Many industry-standard methods and processes used to test body and vehicular armor for law enforcement, military, and personal protection applications were developed at H.P. White. Services evaluate the full scope of threats (stab, slice, bullet, fragment, explosive), and environments (urban, war time, extreme heat/cold). H.P. White’s services add value throughout the supply chain; from research and development processes and product certification to production lot acceptance and post-production quality control. H.P. White serves the needs of Federal, State, local and foreign government agencies, and the manufacturers dedicated to protecting the lives of law enforcement, corrections, private security, war fighters, and civilians, globally.